Joyoshare VidiKit (Video Toolkit)

  • Record screen, audio, webcam, gameplay and specific windows
  • Built-in video editor to crop, subtitle, adjust speed, effect, and more
  • One-stop solution to cut, merge, compress, convert, and repair videos
  • Support 240 FPS and 1080p/4K high-resolution video output

What Happened to | Development

what happened to was an online software that allowed users to convert videos on YouTube into mp3 format. Describing the service it offered, told users, "You do not need an account; the only thing you need is a YouTube URL." Because the software was platform-independent, the service could be used with any device, including Mac, a Linux PC, or iPhone.

You may have already guessed by now that a service that says it "will start to convert the audio track of your video file to mp3 as soon as you have submitted it and you will be able to download it" is likely to be infringing on copyright law. Not long after it started, found itself having to deal with a barrage of lawsuits.

If you try to convert a YouTube video into mp3 today, you will find that no longer exists. What happened to the website that promised audio quality of at least 128 kBit/s, with each download taking between 3 and 4 minutes?

We took some time to answer the question above. We follow the history of the company and look at some of the legal controversies it faced. Finally, we attempt to find out what eventually happened to it.

Part 1. The History of

Writing for the website that calls itself the "largest knowledge and inspiration platform for the digital and marketing scene in Europe,", Torben Lux, reports that was started in 2009. It began as a small project run by an 18-year-old computer science student from the German city of Hannover. The student's name is Philip Matesanz.

Lux reports that when Matesanz started from his bedroom, he had a budget of only 50 euros (about $60 at current rates). The website was not an instant success. Lux quotes Matesanz: "I did not have much experience in creating traffic. My first forays posting in various forums were not successful. No matter what I tried, I could not generate more than 100 visits a day."

Fast forward eight years after was established, and you have a different story. By 2017, the website was attracting 60 million visitors per month from across the world. However, the site was not just attracting attention from its 60 million fans; record companies were baying for blood, accusing it of "stream ripping."

Part 2. Was Legal?

Considering that allowed users to convert any video into mp3 format, many people were left wondering whether the service was safe to use or legitimate.

In an article produced for the tech website,, a writer, who calls himself Random, goes straight to the point when he answers the question, "In a word, the services that offers are illegal." He adds that "It is legal to stream content from a legitimate provider, as long as you do not retain or record that stream."

is youtube mp3 org legal

Part 3. Mounting Legal Challenges

It looks like several other concerned companies in the music business agreed with Random. The legal issues that faced during its lifetime are testimony to this.

The legal challenges faced by resulted from a concept known as "stream ripping." Stream ripping is defined by the Recording Industry Association of America® (RIAA) as "the process of creating a downloadable file from content that is available to stream online."

But what's wrong with stream ripping? Stream ripping is considered piracy. Piracy involves the unauthorized use of someone else's work. While the owners of software services like may have benefited from the traffic they attracted, it is not likely that the owners of the converted videos were gaining anything from the practice.

Part 4. Google Fires Warning Shots may have been popular with users, but it was undoubtedly one of the companies that were not in Google's good books. In 2012, the websites and a range of others providing the same services received a warning from Google informing them that they would find themselves in court if they didn't stop operating.

A report carried by the technology and piracy research website,, quotes YouTube's Associate Product Counsel, Harris Cohen. He says that to "separate, isolate, or modify the audio or video components of any YouTube audiovisual content made available through the YouTube API is illegal." This is because this is considered "externally storing copies of YouTube content."

Matesanz responded to the tech giant's lawsuit threats by launching a campaign against Google, possibly sensing the popularity of the service he offered. He started a petition for Google to allow third-party recording of its content. The petition got 4,341,853 signatures.

Part 5. Court Case in Germany

If Google just offered a threat, the German record industry was prepared to take action against In 2013, the German record industry headed to court accusing of stream ripping.

According to the Music Business Website,, the lawsuit instituted by the German music industry trade body BVMI alleged that, "as well as most other stream ripper sites, generate considerable advertising income that is not shared with the artists or their partners." reports that initially argued that it was not involved in copyright infringements; it just made software. The courts didn't buy's argument, ruling that its activities constituted copyright infringement.

Part 6. A Lawsuit by the World's Biggest Labels

In a 2016 article produced for BBC Music, Mark Savage reports that "Universal, Sony, Warner Bros, and other labels launched legal action against the German operator of in a federal court in Los Angeles."

Savage reports that in their court papers, the companies claimed that "tens, or even hundreds, of millions of tracks, are illegally copied and distributed by stream ripping services each month" and that is the "chief offender." The suing parties were demanding compensation of $150,000 for each song made available for stream ripping.

lawsuit to youtube mp3 org

What Then Happened to

The lawsuit by the major labels finally forced to shut down in 2017. According to, the website came to a settlement with the RIAA that saw it hand its domain over to the music industry representative body. This came after a year of legal battles with the RIAA.


Joyoshare VidiKit

Complete video toolkit combines recording, conversion and editing

Joyoshare Screen Recorder

Best Alternative to Record YouTube Audio to MP3!

Capture YouTube music, movies, shows and more in any format.

Get Now


Leave a comment

  Home >  Resource >  Convert Video >  What Happened to